-
Family Court (rather than Circuit Court) was Proper Forum for Claims Arising out of the Former Marriage of Parties
Allgeier v. Wagner 2024-CA-0496 Jefferson Circuit Court Kentucky Court of Appeals Opinion by Judge Combs Date Rendered: January 17, 2025 Former Wife filed civil suit against Former Husband for indemnification from a tax obligation which arose out of funds misappropriated by Former Husband, willful interference with her custody of the parties’ children, and the tort…
-
Grandparent Visitation Best Interest Analysis Relies on Walker Factors When Child Is with a Nonparent Custodian
Watkins v. Watkins NO. 2022-CA-1472-MR Fayette Circuit Court Kentucky Court of Appeals Opinion by Judge Acree Date Rendered: September 6, 2024 Issue: What is the appropriate best interest standard for grandparent visitation when child is living with a nonparent custodian. Biological Parents lost custody, and Child was placed with Great Aunt. Grandmother petitioned the Family…
-
Custody Order Affirmed as Role of FOC is Advisory
Bentley v. Etherton 2023-CA-0560-MR Kentucky Court of Appeals Bullitt Circuit Court Opinion by Judge Acree Date Rendered: October 18, 2024 On December 10, 2017, Mother fatally shot Father and later pled guilty to murder, leaving their Child at the center of legal disputes. Before her incarceration, Mother signed a medical power of attorney granting Great-Aunt…
-
Family Court not Required to Set Aside an Enforceable Settlement Agreement Under CR 60.02, and to Appoint a GAL, Where the Incarcerated Person Has Elected to Proceed Without Counsel and Without Contest
Jolly v. Jolly No. 2023-CA-1189-ME Bourbon Circuit Court Opinion by Judge Cetrulo Date Rendered: August 30, 2024 Prior to the divorce, Husband entered a guilty plea on numerous fraud and money laundering offenses, and the government seized all real and personal property in Husband and Wife’s joint names. Husband and Wife entered into a settlement…
-
Mullins v. Picklesimer Does Not Require Agreement to Support a Finding of Partial Waiver of Superior Right to Custody
Link v. Link No. 2023-CA-1073-ME Meade Circuit Court Opinion by Judge Karem Date Rendered: July 12, 2024 Child’s biological paternity was never established. Biological Mother and Mother’s husband, Father, raised child to believe Father was child’s biological father. Child called Father “dad,” Mother changed Child’s surname to Father’s surname, Father was a stay-at-home dad, and…
Search
Recent Post
- Family Court (rather than Circuit Court) was Proper Forum for Claims Arising out of the Former Marriage of Parties
- United States Supreme Court Upholds Federal Statute Prohibiting Individuals Subject to Domestic Violence Orders from Possessing Firearms as Constitutional
- Supreme Court Strictly Enforces Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Family Court Violated Father’s Express Due Process Rights under KRS 403.300(3) by Allowing Testimony and Admitting Friend of the Court Report After Prohibiting Father from Taking the Deposition of Children’s Therapist Prior to Hearing
- Order Lacking CR 54.02 Finality Language Is Final When All Issues Are Resolved
